REVEZ, J.; CORUJO, L., 2021. Librarians against fake news: A systematic literature review of llibrary practices (Jan. 2018-Sept. 2020). The Journal of Academic Librarianship. V. 47, no. 2. [Consulta: enero de 2021]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102304
En este estudio se analiza de manera sistemática la literatura científica con el objetivo de identificar las prácticas más recientes en la lucha contra las fake news. Las bibliotecas son percibidas como un actor de gran relevancia en la lucha contra el fenómeno de las noticias falsas, en gran medida por la percepción positiva que se tiene del trabajo de los bibliotecarios. El artículo analiza las prácticas tangibles de las bibliotecas, se discute su eficiencia, y provee de una categorización de dichas prácticas. Todo ello conformado a partir de una revisión sistematizada de la literatura de los últimos tres años, de la cual se recuperaron 27 documentos y a los cuales se les aplicó un análisis multidimensional. De este análisis se puede concluir que la mayoría de las prácticas que las bibliotecas realizan para combatir las fake news se centran realizar acciones de alfabetización en información. El debate actual gira en torno a las estrategias cuyo fin se centra en una evaluación de la fuente basada en la autoridad de la misma.
Referencias
-
A. Affelt. All That’s not fit to print: Fake news and the call to action for librarians and information professionals. Emerald (2019)
- Agosto, 2018 D.E. Agosto (Ed.), Information literacy and libraries in the age of fake news, Libraries Unlimited (2018)
- Ameen and Naeem, 2020 K. Demographic differences in the perceived news literacy skills and sharing behavior of information professionals. Information Discovery and Delivery, Ahead of print (2020), pp. 1-13, 10.1108/IDD-02-2020-0015
- American Library Association, 2015. National policy agenda for libraries: Executive brief. American Library Association (2015). http://www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/pdfs/NPAforLibrariesBrief2.pdf
- Anderson, 2017. Fake news and alternative facts: Five challenges for academic libraries. Insights, 30 (2) (2017), pp. 4-9, 10.1629/uksg.356
- Association of College and Research Libraries, 2016. Framework for information literacy for higher education. Framework for information literacy for higher education .http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (2016)
- Auberry, 2018. Increasing students’ ability to identify fake news through information literacy education and content management systems. The Reference Librarian, 59 (4) (2018), pp. 179-187, 10.1080/02763877.2018.1489935
- Barclay, 2018. Fake news, propaganda, and plain old lies: How to find trustworthy information in the digital age. Rowman & Littlefield (2018)
- Batchelor, 2017. Getting out the truth: The role of libraries in the fight against fake news. Reference Services Review, 45 (2) (2017), pp. 143-148, 10.1108/RSR-03-2017-0006
- Buschman, 2019. Good news, bad news, and fake news: Going beyond political literacy to democracy and libraries. Journal of Documentation, 75 (1) (2019), pp. 213-228, 10.1108/JD-05-2018-0074
- Caridad-Sebastián et al., 2018. Infomediación y posverdad: El papel de las bibliotecas. El Profesional de La Información, 27 (4) (2018), pp. 891-898, 10.3145/epi.2018.jul.17
- Cooke, 2018. Fake news and alternative facts: Information literacy in a post-truth era. ALA Editions (2018)
- Cosentino, 2020. Social media and the post-truth world order: The global dynamics of disinformation. Palgrave Pivot (2020)
- Dahri and Richard, 2018. Librarians joining the fight against fake news: A NUS case study. Singapore Journal of Library and Information Management, 47 (2018), pp. 15-24. https://www.las.org.sg/wp/sjlim/librarians-joining-the-fight-against-fake-news-a-nus-case-study/
- Dalkir and Katz, 202. Navigating fake news, alternative facts, and misinformation in a post-truth world. Information science reference (2020)
- De Paor and Heravi, 2020 .Information literacy and fake news: How the field of librarianship can help combat the epidemic of fake news. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46 (5) (2020), Article 102218, 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.10221
- Delellis and Rubin, 2018. Educators’ perceptions of information literacy and skills required to spot ’fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55 (1) (2018), pp. 785-787, 10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501116
- Dixon-Woods et al., 2006. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6 (1) (2006), pp. 27-44, 10.1177/1468794106058867
- Elías, 2019. Science on the ropes: Decline of scientific culture in the era of fake news. Springer (2019)
- European Commission, 2018. A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent high level group on fake news and online disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union (2018), 10.2759/739290
- Eva and Shea, 2018. Amplify your impact: Marketing libraries in an era of “fake news”. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 57 (3) (2018), pp. 168-171, 10.5860/
- Fontanin, 2018.Con il pretesto delle false notizie: Insegnare il pensiero critico nella scuola italiana a partire da Carol C. Kuhlthau. AIB Studi, 58 (2) (2018), pp. 267-283, 10.2426/aibstudi-11825
- Fuller, 2018. Post- truth: Knowledge as a power game. Anthem Press (2018)
- Glisson, 2019. Breaking the spin cycle: Teaching complexity in the age of fake news. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19 (3) (2019), pp. 461-484, 10.1353/pla.2019.0027
- Greifeneder et al., 2021. The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation, Routledge (2021)
- Hanz and Kingsland, 2020. Fake or for real? A fake news workshop. Reference Services Review, 48 (1) (2020), pp. 91-112, 10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0064
- Hart, 1998. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage Publications (1998)
- IFLA, 2012. IFLA code of ethics for librarians and other information workers. IFLA code of ethics for librarians and other information workers. https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11092 (2012)
- Ireland, 2018. Fake news alerts: Teaching news literacy skills in a meme world. The Reference Librarian, 59 (3) (2018), pp. 122-128, 10.1080/02763877.2018.1463890
- Kitchenham, 2004.Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University (2004). http://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf
- LaPierre and Kitzie, 2019. “Lots of questions about ‘fake news’”: How public libraries have addressed media literacy, 2016–2018. Public Library Quarterly, 38 (4) (2019), pp. 428-452, 10.1080/01616846.2019.1600391
- Liberati et al., 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339 (2009), p. b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2700
- Lim, 2020. Academic library guides for tackling fake news: A content analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46 (5) (2020), Article 102195, 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.10219
- Lopez-Borrull et al., 2018. Fake news, ¿amenaza u oportunidad para los profesionales de la información y la documentación?. El Profesional de La Información, 27 (6) (2018), pp. 1346-1356, 10.3145/epi.2018.nov.17
- Lor, 2018. Democracy, information, and libraries in a time of post-truth discourse. Library Management, 39 (5) (2018), pp. 307-321, 10.1108/LM-06-2017-0061
- Lynch and Hunter, 2020. Conflicting authority: Using the Trump administration’s responses to the EPA climate assessment report to teach information literacy. Reference Services Review, 48 (1) (2020), pp. 201-216, 10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0069
- Mandalios, 2013. RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate internet sources. Journal of Information Science, 39 (4) (2013), pp. 470-478, 10.1177/016555151347888
- Martínez-Cardama and Algora-Cancho, 2019. Lucha contra la desinformación desde las bibliotecas universitarias. El Profesional de La Información, 28 (4) (2019), Article e280412, 10.3145/epi.2019.jul.12
- McIntyre, 2018. Post-truth. MIT Press (2018)
- Moher et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6 (7) (2009), Article e1000097, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
- Musgrove et al., 2018. Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25 (3) (2018), pp. 243-260, 10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444
- Naeem and Bhatti, 2020. S.B. Naeem, R. BhattiThe Covid-19 “infodemic”: A new front for information professionals. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 37 (3) (2020), pp. 233-239, 10.1111/hir.12311
- Neely-Sardon and Tignor, 2018. Focus on the facts: A news and information literacy instructional program. The Reference Librarian, 59 (3) (2018), pp. 108-121, 10.1080/02763877.2018.1468849
- Niedringhaus, 2018. Information literacy in a fake/false news world: Why does it matter and how does it spread?. International Journal of Legal Information, 46 (2) (2018), pp. 97-100, 10.1017/jli.2018.26
- Pek and Wang, 2018. National library board’s public education on information literacy: Teaching citizens to fight fake news. Singapore Journal of Library and Information Management, 47 (2018), pp. 2-14. https://www.las.org.sg/wp/sjlim/nlb-public-education-on-information-literacy/
- Peters et al., 2018. Post-truth, fake news: Viral Modernity & Higher Education, Springer (2018)
- Rana and O'Neill, 2020. Russians spread fake news over Oxford coronavirus vaccine. The Times (2020). https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/russians-spread-fake-news-over-oxford-coronavirus-vaccine-2nzpk8vrq
- Rose-Wiles, 2018. Reflections on fake news, librarians, and undergraduate research. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 57 (3) (2018), pp. 200-204, 10.5860/rusq.57.3.6606
- Rügenhagen et al., 2020. M. Rügenhagen, T.S. Beck, E.J. SartoriusInformation integrity in the era of fake news: An experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity. Bibliothek Forschung Und Praxis, 44 (1) (2020), pp. 34-53, 10.1515/bfp-2020-0005
- Saunders and Budd, 2020. Examining authority and reclaiming expertise. . The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46 (1) (2020), Article 102077, 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.10207
- Stapleton et al., 2020. Developing systematic search methods for the library literature: Methods and analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46 (5) (2020), Article 102190, 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102190
- Sullivan, 2019a. M. SullivanLibraries and fake news: What’s the problem? What’s the plan?. Communications in Information Literacy, 13 (1) (2019), pp. 91-113, 10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.7
- Sullivan, 2019b. Why librarians can’t fight fake news. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51 (4) (2019), pp. 1146-1156, 10.1177/0961000618764258
- Sullivan, 2019c. Leveraging library trust to combat misinformation on social media. Library & Information Science Research, 41 (1) (2019), pp. 2-10, 10.1016/j.lisr.2019.02.004
- The CILIP Information Literacy Group, 2018. The CILIP Information Literacy GroupCILIP definition of information literacy 2018. CILIP (2018). https://infolit.org.uk/ILdefinitionCILIP2018.pdf
- Wade and Hornick, 2018. Stop! Don’t share that story!: Designing a pop-up undergraduate workshop on fake news. The Reference Librarian, 59 (4) (2018), pp. 188-194, 10.1080/02763877.2018.1498430
- Yerbury and Henninger, 2018. Civil commitment and the role of public librarians. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Information literacy in the workplace (pp. 376–385). Springer International Publishing.
- Zimdars and McLeod, 2020. M. Zimdars, K. McLeod (Eds.), Fake news: Understanding media and misinformation in the digital age, MIT Press (2020)
